3 ms·
This sounds a lot like the Single Transferable Vote system that some of us are pushing for in Canada. Same principle, you rank all of the parties that are accep
by devrandomguy 9y ago
This sounds a lot like the Single Transferable Vote system that some of us are pushing for in Canada. Same principle, you rank all of the parties that are acceptable to you, and your vote is applied to the first candidate who isn't eliminated.
This way, if I want the Green party, and am willing to settle for Liberals, but can't stand the thought of a Conservative win, then I can support my favorite party without risking a split vote that lets the hated party squeak in with ~38% of the vote. Naturally, those of us who vote for fringe parties are strongly in favor of STV, and those who benefit from split votes complain that it is too complex for the average voter to understand.
- tonyg 9y agoYou might find Mixed Member Proportional an interesting option. It is directly proportional in the party vote and also includes electorate MPs. It does not suffer from some of the strategic voting problems that STV suffers from.
- devrandomguy 9y agoInteresting, I'm liking the separation of concerns here. My favorite MLA is riding on the wrong party, but MMP would solve that conundrum nicely.
- tylerhou 9y agoBut the problem with schools is different in the sense that each candidate can only accept a finite amount of votes.