4 ms·
I accept the basis of your argument - that point scoring is unhelpful. However, I feel you're missing the point when discussing censorship. If censorship is t
by AOsborn 9y ago
I accept the basis of your argument - that point scoring is unhelpful.
However, I feel you're missing the point when discussing censorship.
If censorship is to be justly applied, there must be some objective measure of what is offensive - which then must be applied equally regardless of political alignment. This is definitely not happening at the moment.
Personally, I think a better perspective is to reduce and/or avoid censorship altogether, especially as far as internet infrastructure is concerned. Corporate entities shouldn't be enforcing the views of their stakeholders on the individual.
Free speech is free speech, even if I don't like what you're saying.
- mirimir 9y ago> Personally, I think a better perspective is to reduce and/or avoid censorship altogether, especially as far as internet infrastructure is concerned. Yes! Systems ought to be designed such that censorship is impossible. Not just that we won't censor because we're so liberal and all. No, just plain uncensorable by design. Edit: language