I do wonder how this disagrees with the popular argument in favor of net neutrality? The point being that limiting who can distribute and therefore create acces

I do wonder how this disagrees with the popular argument in favor of net neutrality? The point being that limiting who can distribute and therefore create access to information is generally agreed upon as unacceptable. Would it be different if service providers (your ISP) made some content they select inaccessible (not net neutral) rather than Google et al?