4 ms·

I interpreted it to mean that he showed that Hilary's campaign was overconfident on polling, and with proper statistical analysis she would have seen something

by dhimes 9y ago

I interpreted it to mean that he showed that Hilary's campaign was overconfident on polling, and with proper statistical analysis she would have seen something closer to the truth. He apparently has worked for both Obama and Trump.

dragonwriter 9y ago
Yes, and that is all relatively uncontroversial (that he did that, or at least presented material which purported to do that.) What is controversial and unsubstantiated is his suggestion that that is the reason for the ban.