3 ms·
It seems that his ban may be political in nature according to his tweet. https://twitter.com/salilstatistics/status/898912228128296960 https://twitter.com/sali
by googler231 9y ago
It seems that his ban may be political in nature according to his tweet.
https://twitter.com/salilstatistics/status/898912228128296960 https://twitter.com/salilstatistics/status/89891222812829696...
Salil Mehta: "Shameful: if you show probability work like Hillary having lower election odds, then this is new definition of hate speech. @JulianAssange"
- dragonwriter 9y agoClearly, he claims that it is tied to 2016 political campaign position. No substantive evidence for that is presented, though.
- dhimes 9y agoI interpreted it to mean that he showed that Hilary's campaign was overconfident on polling, and with proper statistical analysis she would have seen something closer to the truth. He apparently has worked for both Obama and Trump.
- dragonwriter 9y agoYes, and that is all relatively uncontroversial (that he did that, or at least presented material which purported to do that.) What is controversial and unsubstantiated is his suggestion that that is the reason for the ban.
- bassman9000 9y agoSeems Is that tweet in violation of Google's Terms and Conditions? edit: formatting
- lightedman 9y agoTwitter is not owned by Google. Google's ToS cannot interfere with his activity on a property they do not own. That would be tortious interference of contract.