caseydurfee: > this is a ludicrous accusation -- the new definition of hate speech? slackstation: > This has to be a mistake. > it was probably someone who s

caseydurfee: > this is a ludicrous accusation -- the new definition of hate speech? slackstation: > This has to be a mistake. > it was probably someone who saw one of these procative headlines and marked this blog for deletion without looking or realizing who this person was. redm: > It does indeed seem he was shut down, but it's unclear as to "why" it was done. Google's standard black box in effect. ForHackernews: > I highly doubt there's any political agenda at play here. At least 4 out of 11 parent comments so far cover: the "ludicrous accusation" of the censored victim, "it was probably mistakenly banned and repeatedly denied further attempts at access", "we're not sure why he's banned", and "we're not sure why he's banned, but it's certainly not related to all of the other political censorship and outright subversive manipulation that's been occurring towards anyone who doesn't subscribe to the mainstream media narrative". That's right, nothing to see here folks. Dismiss this crazy person for speaking the truth. Statistics should be supressed. Deny their ability to speak out against the extreme subversion that is taking place. Deny their ability to organize. Isolate and destroy. Or you're next.