The post makes the argument that selling things is speech and that shopify is protecting free speech by not dropping controversial clients. You claim that this

The post makes the argument that selling things is speech and that shopify is protecting free speech by not dropping controversial clients. You claim that this argument is disingenuous, ie that the argument is not sincere. It seems sincere to me. I think it's a pretty convincing argument. Free speech doesn't mean a whole lot if you can't buy pen and paper, or engage some web company to host your website, or sell merchandise (so this post argues).