3 ms·
I still have one, I really don't think the image quality is that bad considering its age.
by amiga-workbench 9y ago
I still have one, I really don't think the image quality is that bad considering its age.
- cr0sh 9y agoWasn't it something like 1 or 2 megapixels? For many purposes, that's not bad at all. I still keep around a few old Kodak DC3200 cameras, which have a 1.3 mp resolution for use in my shop. One of those was my second digital camera (well, as long as you don't count the various video digitizers I've owned over the years - starting with a DS-69B on my TRS-80 Color Computer); my first real digital camera was this el-cheapo something-or-another that took grainy 320x240 images. I keep and use the DC3200s in my shop because I don't care if I handle them while my hands are grimy or whatnot, while they still take a decent picture. Their only downside is that they use CF cards, but I still have a ton of those anyhow.
- amiga-workbench 9y agoMine is 1.3, it takes images at a VGA resolution. A single image at full res practically fills up the floppy disk, I've got to shoot at a lower quality if I want to take more images. I'm positively spoiled by my Sony A6000.
- lakkal 9y agoI had the lesser model of Mavica that I think could only take pictures in 640x480; at least, it seems like all of my pictures with it are 640x480. Not sure now whether it could do 800x600 or whether that was just the more expensive model.