4 ms·
She couldn't prove sexism in court. Twice now. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pao_v._Kleiner_Perkins https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pao_v._Kleiner_Perkins W
by imaginenore 9y ago
She couldn't prove sexism in court. Twice now.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pao_v._Kleiner_Perkins https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pao_v._Kleiner_Perkins
Why would you defend false allegations by Pao? They hurt women that actually do experience it. They also give more evidence to the fact that women do use the system to get rich quick by suing in hopes of getting a massive settlement.
She should be condemned and her claims should not be used to demonstrate sexism, which is what you're trying to do.
- yorwba 9y agoDid you mean to reply to a different comment? This one says > It's easy to get hung up on the particulars of Pao's story and get sidetracked into defending or judging her, but I feel that is besides the point. in its opening sentence.
- dang 9y agoThis crosses into personal attack. You don't have anything like the basis you would need to credibly post such inflammatory claims, so this comment breaks the HN guidelines. We ban accounts that do this, and I'm sorry to say you've done it repeatedly in the past. Please fix this if you want to continue commenting here. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
- imaginenore 9y agoWhat exactly is a "personal attack" here? I posted widely published information. There's even a link.
- dang 9y agoObviously you went beyond facts into making an unsupported claim about motive.