4 ms·
Not quite; I think '.c.o' is the equivalent in the original Make syntax?
by zbuf 9y ago
Not quite; I think '.c.o' is the equivalent in the original Make syntax?
- majewsky 9y agoThat's nowhere near equivalent. For example, it cannot replace the following things: pkg/test/migrations/%.sql: pkg/db/migrations/%.sql build/%.cover.out: prepare-check FORCE (In the second one, $* is then used in the build rule, which is why % does not need to show up in the prerequisites list.) Examples from https://github.com/sapcc/limes/blob/62e07b430e2019a6c189144350bae34c574b2f55/Makefile https://github.com/sapcc/limes/blob/62e07b430e2019a6c1891443...