3 ms·

http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3389 http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3389 Scott Aaronson considers it to be valid. Being conservative doesn't negate

• pron 9y ago
  Scott Aaronson is not an expert on this matter, either, and, as far as I know, he hasn’t even seriously studied the subject as an amateur. I didn’t say that being conservative negates the argument in the first article (and the second is irrelevant regardless of Alexander’s conservatism); I just pointed it out to note that the publication picked scientists who reflect their views rather than attempted to neutrally present the current state of affairs in the relevant social scholarship.
  • deepnotderp 9y ago
    > I just pointed it out to note that the publication picked scientists who reflect their views rather than attempted to neutrally present the current state of affairs in the relevant social scholarship. In stark contrast to liberal publications who never do that. /s
    • pron 9y ago
      In stark contrast to scholarly treatment, which, even if biased, at least attempts to address different perspectives.