3 ms·
Minor problem: that's EXACTLY what the media and outrage engine is specifying.
by deepnotderp 9y ago
Minor problem: that's EXACTLY what the media and outrage engine is specifying.
- pron 9y agoThat's not what I see, so I guess both our views on what the media and "outrage engine" are doing are very much shaped by our political views.
- deepnotderp 9y agohttps://www.google.com/search?q=sexist+google+memo&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjlpvW2oObVAhVK6GMKHQRLCDgQ_AUICigB&biw=1859&bih=990 https://www.google.com/search?q=sexist+google+memo&source=ln...
- pron 9y agoWhat am I supposed to see here? (Are you, by any chance, be confusing the word "sexism" with the word "misogyny"?)
- deepnotderp 9y agoYou're supposed to see that the media considers it to be malevolently sexist. Redefining the terminology so that "sexism" somehow is a neutral term is, for lack of a better phrase, "not an argument".
- pron 9y agoI don’t see it. I certainly see many references to it as a bad thing that needs addressing, just like germs are a real and serious problem that needs fighting, but that doesn’t mean that the people who spread germs do it with the intent to cause others harm. So I don’t see “malevolent sexism”, and I don’t see references to Damore as a misogynist.