3 ms·
This isn't worth reading. (It's painfully naive, poorly reasoned, has inaccurate facts, is largely incoherent, etc. Even bad articles can serve as a nice promp
by jmull 9y ago
This isn't worth reading.
(It's painfully naive, poorly reasoned, has inaccurate facts, is largely incoherent, etc. Even bad articles can serve as a nice prompt for discussion, but I don't even think this is even good for that. I don't we'd ever get past arguing about what it is most wrong about.)
- alexandercrohde 9y agoI think is borderline ad-hominem.
- khedoros1 9y agoI think that the comment is attacking the essay, rather than attacking the essay by attacking the author. I think it's worth reading, but I also think it would've been better if it didn't repeatedly contradict itself, say that features don't exist that clearly do, and so on.