3 ms·

Well you didn't mention the ISIS sites. Much of the torrents are actually illegal, the hate speech is protected speech.

• peteretep 9y ago
  "Protected" from the government, not from private entities. I would gladly support Namecheap taking down Isis sites, but is there any evidence that they aren't?
  • madengr 9y ago
    Well what about net neutrality (my thread on that is already -2)? Neo-nazi shows are on cable access channels. I'd think the same reasoning applies.
    • peteretep 9y ago
      > cable access channels. I'd > think the same reasoning > applies That's because you haven't done even the most basic of research.
      • madengr 9y ago
        No I have not. So what's the reason, in a nutshell?
• nine_k 9y ago
  The 1st amendment protects speech from being suppressed by the state. Private entities may ban whatever they see fit, basically; you know they do if you ever read a end-user license.
  • madengr 9y ago
    Yes, I know that. We are talking about a public communications medium. If they can throttle hate speech, they can throttle Netflix. So they won't host it, they won't provide DNS resolution. How far does it go? Can't get a static IP?