2 ms·
The article doesn't give me any convincing arguments against UBI. The author uses Saudi Arabia as an example as a country with UBI that works badly. First of a
by y7 9y ago
The article doesn't give me any convincing arguments against UBI.
The author uses Saudi Arabia as an example as a country with UBI that works badly. First of all, I have no intimate with if there is any implementation. The author does not provide any sources, so that's not much help. A cursory Google search leads me to doubt this claim [1]. The author claims >50% unemployment in the country, again doubtful [2].
Then, the article states that proponents of a UBI claim that it allows people to self-improve and take risks, equating this with a transition from a low skilled worker to a high skilled one, which seems a far stretch. Of course automation removes low skilled jobs; but more training does not automagically turn everyone into PhDs with un-automateable jobs.
Then there are even more wild claims about it leading to a demise of the American democracy, where I don't even begin to see how the author came up with it.
1: https://www.quora.com/Is-Saudi-Arabia-an-implementation-of-basic-income https://www.quora.com/Is-Saudi-Arabia-an-implementation-of-b...
2: http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/07/saudi-arabia-unemployment-rate-climbs-127-percent-170730163025234.html http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/07/saudi-arabia-unemploym...
- criddell 9y ago> The article doesn't give me any convincing arguments against UBI. I'd love to ask the author how a guaranteed income would change his life. Would he stop writing? Does he only write for the money?
- Posibyte 9y agoIt was the incredulous claim of Americans losing their liberties that really had me looking up from my tablet and asking myself "Is this man serious?" I'm not sure if this article exists only for the money, some agenda, or merely fearmongering. But in any case, the fact that it is getting so much attention and this kind of reporting is considered good journalism is worrying to me.