ETS speaks nothing about societies or their rules. ETS was invented by studying animals and plants and it stick to genotype and phenotype distributions while ex

ETS speaks nothing about societies or their rules. ETS was invented by studying animals and plants and it stick to genotype and phenotype distributions while explaining role of sex in evolution. And I do not like the idea to speculate about societies and how to build them properly starting from some evolutionary reaserch. It is different levels of abstraction. It is complex to do it right, while stretching your mind over several levels. It needs a broad knowledge, high intelligence and a lot of time spent in thinking and discussing matters with others highly intelligent and broadly educated. Look, between evolution theory and sociology there are physiology, neuroscience and psychology. There are a lot of progress lately in psysiology and neuroscience, but psychology almost 150 years struggling to become an empirical science. There are some progress, but it is not convincing. Also I'm not sure that psysiology and neuroscience progress is sufficient to talk about brigde between theory of evolution and sociology. There are tremendous amounts of work for scientists ahead, which must be done before we can start to reason about society from evolutionary perspective.