Thanks for that link. It was a concise and good read. I don't like the terminology used for the patent retaliation clauses. I see the "weak patent retaliation

Thanks for that link. It was a concise and good read. I don't like the terminology used for the patent retaliation clauses. I see the "weak patent retaliation clause" as fair (within the scope of patent retaliation) and the "strong patent retaliation clause" as harmful. If I had a say in the matter, I'd like to call a spade a spade and help people understand what these really mean. The terms "weak" and "strong" in this context appear meaningless to me. Without explaining what the clauses mean, the terms themselves don't provide any indication of the (comparative) utility of these.