4 ms·
From The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature: >In the ancient empire of the Incas, sex was a heavily regulated industry. The sun-king Atahualpa ke
by Houshalter 9y ago
From The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature:
>In the ancient empire of the Incas, sex was a heavily regulated industry. The sun-king Atahualpa kept fifteen hundred women in each of many “houses of virgins” throughout his kingdom. They were selected for their beauty and were rarely chosen after the age of eight—to ensure their virginity. But they did not all remain virgins for long: They were the emperor’s concubines. Beneath him, each rank of society afforded a harem of a particular legal size. Great lords had harems of more than seven hundred women. “Principal persons” were allowed fifty women; leaders of vassal nations, thirty; heads of provinces of 100,000 people, twenty; leaders of 1,000 people, fifteen; administrators of 500 people, twelve; governors of 100 people, eight; petty chiefs over 50 men, seven; chiefs of 10 men, five; chiefs of 5 men, three. That left precious few for the average male Indian whose enforced near-celibacy must have driven him to desperate acts, a fact attested to by the severity of the penalties that followed any cuckolding of his seniors. If a man violated one of Atahualpa’s women, he, his wife, his children, his relatives, his servants, his fellow villagers, and all his lamas would be put to death, the village would be destroyed, and the site strewn with stones.
>As a result, Atahualpa and his nobles had, shall we say, a majority holding in the paternity of the next generation. They systematically dispossessed less privileged men of their genetic share of posterity. Many of the Inca people were the children of powerful men.
>In the kingdom of Dahomey in West Africa, all women were at the pleasure of the king. Thousands of them were kept in the royal harem for his use, and the remainder he suffered to “marry” the more favored of his subjects. The result was that Dahomean kings were very fecund, while ordinary Dahomean men were often celibate and barren. In the city of Abomey, according to one nineteenth-century visitor, “it would be difficult to find Dahomeans who were not descended from royalty.” The connection between sex and power is a long one.
- jessaustin 9y agoOne suspects the celibacy assumption says more about we who assume rather than the ancient societies of whom we assume. This is a kind of inter-millennial sexism. If a single king could have relations with hundreds of women, why can't a (presumably professional) woman have relations with hundreds of men? In such a top-heavy situation, she would have found plenty of willing customers! Sure, we are prejudiced against prostitution, but lots of ancient societies weren't.
- sorokod 9y agoA single woman is unlikely to have produce a statistically significant number of children. This is not about the act of sex but about actual reproduction.
- jessaustin 9y agoHaha it's late my brain stopped working for a moment there...
- ak39 9y agoWell written. Pretty much the same story of rulers, kings and emperors of 10th to 19th century India. Or China. Indian palace life and architecture,for example, were built around the availability of unending lines of concubines for the Shah!
- salimane 9y agoI would be very interested in your sources about the kingdom of Dahomey in West Africa.
- extra88 9y agoEverything but the last sentence is a quote from the book stated in the first sentence.