4 ms·
Speak for yourself haha. This is a matter of trajectory. As you get older, you'll follow the trajectory you maintain. I exercise creativity more than fitness an
by gt_ 9y ago
Speak for yourself haha. This is a matter of trajectory. As you get older, you'll follow the trajectory you maintain. I exercise creativity more than fitness and I feel incredible hahahaha.
Here's the key: Balance practice with theory.
It's very sad to see so many people correlate creativity with childishness. What a farce!
Kids are an amazing source of inspiration, and I make a point to cherish every moment around them. But, as you grow, you will probably develop more rigid understandings of the world and society. There's little there that means you are less creative; quite the contrary. But, maybe it's less likely you are exercising it. There are a lot of misnomers out there these days, and the understandings are not found where they should be (like art school).
The point about process is one of the hardest parts these days. Rare alternative art histories offer radically different interpretations of creativity, and they are usually more archaeologically/anthropologically sound as well. Either way, our hurdles are related to many modern cultural trends like habitual idolization, genius fantasies, missed relationships with time and presence. It's a hard one and I have struggled with it a lot, so know you're not alone. The reality is that art is so rarely abstracted in the mind devoid of medium and time. Art is an interaction with materials and process BUT NOT an obsession with them. Obsess on other things. The gap in the middle harbors what we call the creativity. If you don't maintain the boundaries, you won't maintain the gap. Or, if you focus on creativity, you're missing the point and just getting older.
Good luck!!! Oh and put yourself into art history because it's all interpreted anyhow. "We don't know! Let's find out!"
- snapcracklebach 9y agoWhat an interesting perspective. Beautifully said.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- coldtea 9y ago>Speak for yourself haha. This is a matter of trajectory. As you get older, you'll follow the trajectory you maintain. I exercise creativity more than fitness and I feel incredible hahahaha. https://www.thehairpin.com/2017/07/men-you-dont-have-to-write-haha-at-the-end-of-statements/ https://www.thehairpin.com/2017/07/men-you-dont-have-to-writ...
- withholding 9y agoThanks for this.
- coldtea 9y agoYeah, not meant as sneering -- just a note that some things are "redundant syntax".
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- gt_ 9y agoNote that they may just appear that way because you don't get the joke or don't find it funny. Sounds like sneering to me, but maybe I just don't find it funny. For dummies: Using the same expression in different contexts, even in the same paragraph, is useful and acceptable. 'Haha' is a literary representation of laughter. It's an expression of the effect of laughter. The article you posted separates effect from cause, splitting the possible jokes in half. This makes things awkward, unsurprisingly. It's foolish and probably misinformed sneering. Things can even get more complicated! You would be amazed: The more 'ha's, the more laughter. An easy example why this is not redundancy is in the difference between the half-hearted 'ha' and the more genuine 'haha' and the hyperloaded 'hahaha'. Good luck out there!