2 ms·

She =) But thanks for your sexist assumptions! They're awesome!

• bauerd 9y ago
  Did you just assume personhood? You might be responding to a Markov chain for all we know.
  • empressplay 9y ago
    Are you saying Markov chains can't be sexist?
    • coldtea 9y ago
      Seeing that they are mere algorithms, yes. Being X implies intention. At best they can accidentally put out something sexist as a result of their input.
• nolok 9y ago
  That comment has got to be a joke... Right?
• coldtea 9y ago
  Sexist or just "statistically likely"? And aren't assumptions the very thing one has to base on statistics?