All I know is this is a very slippery slope and somewhat of a litmus test, much like Larry Flynt / Hustler case. The reasoning goes that these, admittedly extre

All I know is this is a very slippery slope and somewhat of a litmus test, much like Larry Flynt / Hustler case. The reasoning goes that these, admittedly extreme views are a canary in the coal mine, and for as long as they aren't suppressed everyone else is likely to be OK. But once our corporate masters figure out they can now suppress speech they disagree with (or even agree with but can't publicly admit it), they'll be pulling on that handle like an opioid junkie. The list of topics could be very broad, and the recent example of James Damore shows that views don't even have to be extreme: a bit of virtue signaling from professional victim groups is quite sufficient.