4 ms·
Yes, if it would be code, pretty redundant. But the main point was that such a zip bomb species would be a fault of the universal system. I don't think it's th
by iammyIP 9y ago
Yes, if it would be code, pretty redundant.
But the main point was that such a zip bomb species would be a fault of the universal system. I don't think it's that stupidly designed.
- pavel_lishin 9y ago> I don't think it's that stupidly designed. I don't think it's designed at all.
- iammyIP 9y agoWhy would you think that? Without any system there wouldn't be any science.
- pavel_lishin 9y agoThe short answer is, "I'm an atheist", and the long answer you can sort of google for yourself.
- iammyIP 9y agoGoogle gives nothing. From your sentence i can only deduce that you don't believe in scientific results and instead in some other 'erratically acting' null-deity. But that can't be the case, since we can build airplanes and satellites based on our understanding of how the natural system works. Why would you say that these things work and could stop to do so if the supposed null-deity doesnt think it's appropriate now, acting by no law in particular?