5 ms·

What do you expect them to do? Transcribe what would've been said if they hadn't been cut off?

• mslate 9y ago
  These are legitimate complaints (I'm the interviewer)--if you guys have got any suggestions about how to improve the format I'm all ears. Like lgas says, transcriptions are tricky beasts.
  • alexandercrohde 9y ago
    I mean I'd just recommend turning it into two-pages of the most interesting material that was said in that conversation. The title is interesting, I'd rather read a 2-paragraph article on just that than a 10 page article that answers a bunch of mostly-unrelated stuff. But if the answer to the question isn't shocking (e.g. he got rejected after re-interviewing) then I'd just recommend asking different questions because the tech industry is outrageous and full of crazy stuff (e.g. Silicon Valley gets it).
• mywittyname 9y ago
  It would be best if they didn't do it in the first place. But since the damage is done, I think it would be best to omit the interruption and try to blend the paragraphs together as best as possible. I found my self reading one paragraph, then the other, repeatedly to try and mentally note how to transition over interruption. It would be nice if that was just done for me.