5 ms·
They wouldn't have to prove anything with messaging like his if their search engine was really bigger than we think: they would post search profits that could c
by matt_wulfeck 9y ago
They wouldn't have to prove anything with messaging like his if their search engine was really bigger than we think: they would post search profits that could come even a few miles close to Google. Let's take a look:
> Bing: $2B
> Google: $24B
Source: https://www.google.com/amp/searchengineland.com/google-search-ad-revenues-271188/amp https://www.google.com/amp/searchengineland.com/google-searc...
- ForRealsies 9y agoThat is bigger than I thought tho.
- matt_wulfeck 9y agoJust to prove a point here that these "33%" numbers don't make sense. They claim 33% of the search pie but less than 10% of the profits.
- dorgo 9y agoMaybe the advertisers pay less per click for Bing as for google?
- mywittyname 9y agoAre they still paying people to use it?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- MarkMc 9y agoIf Bing had to pay Microsoft to be the default search engine on Windows then it's profit might be $0