3 ms·
Seems like the ACLU could have left off the part about "people who want to carry weapons" and just went with "people who are intent on committing violence" if t
by gmiller123456 9y ago
Seems like the ACLU could have left off the part about "people who want to carry weapons" and just went with "people who are intent on committing violence" if they wanted to be clear about it.
I think the quote below shows this is specifically about carrying firearms, regardless of intent.
>"If a protest group insists, ‘No, we want to be able to
>carry loaded firearms,’ well, we don’t have to represent
>them. They can find someone else," the newspaper quoted
> Anthony Romero, the ACLU’s executive director since
>2001, as saying.
- unityByFreedom 9y agoCan't it be both? Guns + intent to be violent = no ACLU support