I knew I'd get pushback on that one, it is somewhat hyperbolic; I'm here using "most ergonomic" to mean "closest source-level similarity to the synchronous equi

I knew I'd get pushback on that one, it is somewhat hyperbolic; I'm here using "most ergonomic" to mean "closest source-level similarity to the synchronous equivalent." Which is perhaps not the "best" way to model concurrency, but has the advantage of being very easy to learn.