The EFF has addressed porn when it comes into their purview - e.g. the recent string of anti-"revenge porn" laws. But you answered your question yourself - cens

The EFF has addressed porn when it comes into their purview - e.g. the recent string of anti-"revenge porn" laws. But you answered your question yourself - censoring porn is a time-honored tradition(it's an exception in the FA), while censoring political speech is not(there are wide-ranging protections for political speech). In this sense, the EFF is championing its primary cause - the application and effectiveness of laws as they pertain to the digital world. The issue of private companies and public spaces for free speech has been controversial(http://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-01/54-quasi-public-places.html http://law.justia.com/constitution/us/amendment-01/54-quasi-...) and the EFF has usually fought on the side of expanding the concept of public places, as far as I know.