7 ms·
I generally agree with your comment, but I found this stament to be inaccurate: > (more popular than Rails actually) [citation needed]. The largest websites/w
by acangiano 16y ago
I generally agree with your comment, but I found this stament to be inaccurate:
> (more popular than Rails actually)
[citation needed]. The largest websites/web applications in the world are built in Rails much more frequently than in Django. And there is much more demand for Rails developers in the marketplace. I fail to see evidence that Django is actually used more than Rails is in the real world.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- mrduncan 16y agoThe largest websites/web applications in the world are built in Rails much more frequently than in Django. While we're calling each other out for citations, that's an awfully big statement to make without citations as well. Let's just put it this way: Both frameworks power large sites, you pretty much can't go wrong with either.
- acangiano 16y ago> While we're calling each other out for citations, that's an awfully big statement to make without citations as well. I made the statement because I'm ready to back it up. Among the most popular 1000 sites on the web, you will find at least a dozen Rails sites [1]. There are extremely common names like Twitter, Hulu, Scribd, Justin.TV, White/Yellow Pages, Urban Dictionary, etc. How many Django sites do you see in the top 1000? Curse.com was one of the largest Django sites out there (a case study in the 1st edition of the Django Book). They switched to ASP.NET upon being acquired. [1] http://rails100.pbworks.com/Alexa+Rankings http://rails100.pbworks.com/Alexa+Rankings > Let's just put it this way: Both frameworks power large sites, you pretty much can't go wrong with either. Without a doubt. And I've made this exact point many times before. I was just arguing against the unsubstantiated claim made by the op of this thread.
- andrewtj 16y agoYou may want to reread his post. The penultimate sentence is a kicker.
- binspace 16y agoYeah it's a hoot, especially coming from the guy who will kill people not using statistics, which is a great read btw. http://www.zedshaw.com/essays/programmer_stats.html http://www.zedshaw.com/essays/programmer_stats.html I'm sure it's just an off-the-cuff remark. I've made plenty in my day.
- andrewtj 16y agoI'm sure it's just an off-the-cuff remark. The guy weighs in on the opposite side of something that is common knowledge, then says you should check what I'm saying because I could be fibbing, oh and I'm famous for having a bias against the side I've just disfavoured — and you reach that conclusion? If I were a cynic I'd say both you and he were trolling, but I rather think he was just taking the mickey and it's turned into a rather droll black comedy.
- binspace 16y ago> and you reach that conclusion? I think Zed is a good guy. He is certainly civil in person and tends to have well thought out arguments. I was surprised by the claim without any data to back it up. I missed the whole implicit common knowledge part. I thought people were trying to defend his statement. > it's turned into a rather droll black comedy. I'll defer to you on this one. I wasn't intending on being a troll, so sorry if it turned out that way. I'm just annoyed that I was getting downvoted over what I thought were valid questions.
- binspace 16y agoaah, it was supposed to be humorous. Jeez, I guess the jokes on me. > and you reach that conclusion? The only conclusion I have reached so far is that you are a dick.