Agree... but cloudflare was basically arguing that they should be considered something like "common carrier" because very few companies have the technology and

Agree... but cloudflare was basically arguing that they should be considered something like "common carrier" because very few companies have the technology and network to build DDoS resistant websites. I don't know how true that is, but if so... it stands to reason that free speech on the internet could be in danger. But who knows, maybe we'll get better DDoS protection technology in the future :)