3 ms·
Violence in defense is also not the same as violence in offense. Defending yourself or your group is the right thing to do, but you can overreact and be counter
by ece 9y ago
Violence in defense is also not the same as violence in offense. Defending yourself or your group is the right thing to do, but you can overreact and be counterproductive to your goals. Fascism and racism have no qualms about using offensive violence.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/us/antifa-left-wing-faction-far-right.html https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/us/antifa-left-wing-facti...
- ptaipale 9y agoThe G20 riots had absolutely no element of "violence in defense". Same applies to many cases. I find it obscure how people go on justifying violence when it just happens to feel good with the political agenda.
- ece 9y agoViolence doesn't work for a political agenda. It never has. I am distinguishing between the historically offensive violent ideologies of nazis and racists, with the historically reactionary use of violence-as-a-tactic for antifa and black bloc. The latters use of violence should be stopped, since it isn't helping in furthering the lefts political agenda. We wouldn't be talking about them at all if not for the rise of Hitler in the 1930s and Trump now. These groups are not all the same level of threats to society. We need to focus on stopping the violence on all sides through better protesting permits apparently, and stopping the fascists and racists from gaining more political power.