> 3 aims for code review: > 1. Style/consistency, re-use of existing code, utils, etc. > 2. Architecture/design, how does this fit into the rest of the codeba

> 3 aims for code review: > 1. Style/consistency, re-use of existing code, utils, etc. > 2. Architecture/design, how does this fit into the rest of the codebase, scaling concerns, how will the deploy work, will this have race conditions, etc. > 3. Knowledge sharing with other members of the team. > Currently, it looks like this would satisfy half each of 1 and 2 In my opinion, Even a service that address the 1) and 2) add lots of value for so many IT projects (out side of cutting edge Startup companies )