7 ms·
That's not a particularly strong argument. It's just a call to authority argument without actually adding any real information one way or the other.
by jeb 16y ago
That's not a particularly strong argument. It's just a call to authority argument without actually adding any real information one way or the other.
- lisper 16y agoYou do not understand the argument from authority. Argument from authority would be if PG had said that I'm right because, say, I had a Ph.D. But being an early Google employee when the topic under discussion is the early days of Google doesn't make on an authority, it makes one a primary source. But you may have noticed that I did not bring this up. That's because your factual claims are easily debunked with information from the public record.
- jeb 16y agoHow can such a long argument go on and nobody is simply making a post with a series of numbers showing search engine marketshare from 2001?