3 ms·
I could type faster (and without looking) on the old Nokia style keypads than I can on a touchscreen.
by hohghitlblkh 9y ago
I could type faster (and without looking) on the old Nokia style keypads than I can on a touchscreen.
- merpnderp 9y agoSo could I. No looking at the keyboard and almost never making a typo. I had to backspace and correct 3 typos writing this on my iPhone with autocorrect fixing several more.
- zamalek 9y agoMaybe this will change with tactile screens. Touch screen keyboards are the result of a severe underestimation of the importance of the human element in hardware design.
- baddox 9y agoThat's surprising to me. The physical phone keyboards I have used have require far too much activation pressure for me to type anywhere near as quickly as I do on an iPhone. I do think my error rate would be lower with a physical keyboard, and I could obviously type better without looking at my keyboard, but the former isn't enough of a difference and the latter isn't something I would need to do anyway except perhaps in very unusual circumstances.
- lunchables 9y agoI think that lower error rate is the key. I've been using an iPhone since 2010 and I still can't type on it. The amount of time I spend pressing, holding, dragging the cursor back to make a correction, or backspacing, to fix errors more than offsets any difference in typing speed because of the pressure required on a physical keyboard. Just speaking for myself, obviously, I'm sure other people may have different experiences.
- CaptSpify 9y agoalso: much more screen-space as the keyboard doesn't have to take over.