3 ms·
> Don't use Adobe Photoshop I'll disagree and say that Photoshop is faster and simpler, why? Because I'm better with it. Use whatever graphics program you're
by nnash 16y ago
> Don't use Adobe Photoshop
I'll disagree and say that Photoshop is faster and simpler, why? Because I'm better with it.
Use whatever graphics program you're best with.
First of all if you're only using gradients and layer effects like multiple borders most of that stuff can be done with CSS now.
The links below are for buttons and shapes but you can apply those effects to anything:
http://blog.anomalyinnovations.com/2010/03/creating-a-realistic-looking-button-with-css3/ http://blog.anomalyinnovations.com/2010/03/creating-a-realis...
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/build-kick-ass-practical-css3-buttons/ http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/build-...
http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/quick-tip-practical-css-shapes/ http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/html-css-techniques/quick-...
Also photoshop is just as competent at saving images with those effects if you convert it to a smart object and rasterize it first.
- metamemetics 16y agoCSS3 or webkit extensions or mozilla extensions != CSS. I would never use any of those methods (for say, the next 2 years or if it was only a personal site I didn't care about and not a customer site). Also the learning curve to do stuff faster with Fireworks than Photoshop is maybe 30 minutes, it's that simple.
- nnash 16y agoI wish I had enough karma to down-vote you for insinuating that the current browser implementations of the CSS3 draft aren't CSS.
- metamemetics 16y ago1. CSS==CSS1, CSS3==CSS3. CSS3!=CSS1. 100% of users see CSS1, 50% see CSS3. 2. Everything was explicit, there were no insinuations. 3. You aren't allowed to downvote replies to your own comment even if you had higher karma.