I like the paper. But it does not have much to do with the traditional canon of philosophical problems. Thankfully it does nothing more than set out a conceptua

I like the paper. But it does not have much to do with the traditional canon of philosophical problems. Thankfully it does nothing more than set out a conceptual space in which the general theoretical framework of AI can be analysed. I guess that might be philosophical pragmatism, i.e. finding answers/language sufficient to one's needs and conditions. But there are no especially overt second-order epistemological/ontological claims, e.g. such as figuring out what knowledge is or can be.