5 ms·
The algorithm is calculating the mean of the set of images, so putting 1000 copies of the same image will do absolutely nothing
by lightbyte 9y ago
The algorithm is calculating the mean of the set of images, so putting 1000 copies of the same image will do absolutely nothing
- jotato 9y agoi mean to remove the watermark on that specific image
- 0x0 9y agoThey would probably use the same warp every time on a specific image, so that you can't average it out across multiple download sessions.
- azdle 9y agoThe idea is to use a randomly-warped per-image watermark. So in theory, there's exactly one distinct watermark per image, so 1000 of the same image would have the same watermark.
- Kdparker 9y agoIt would be easy to change that hash by modifying one pixel per image (pick one that is unaffected by the watermark).
- azdle 9y agoI'm not sure what you're suggesting. Change what hash? Of the image? I can't think of how that could help with removing a watermark.
- LukeShu 9y agojotato: I believe this can be defeated by tricking the watermarker in to generating 1000 distinct watermarks for the same image. azdle: That won't work, because "there's exactly one distinct watermark per image, so 1000 of the same image would have the same watermark." Kdparker: So subtle alter the image, to trick the watermarker in to thinking the image isn't the same, thus generating more distinct watermarks for the (effectively) same image.
- baddox 9y agoIf you have the original image, the problem is already solved. If you don't have the original image, then all you will be doing is submitting the watermarked image and having the site apply another random watermark to it.
- colejohnson66 9y agoCouldn't I run the result through Photoshop with some "Content Aware Fill" on the remaining spots?