> Tragedy for the tourists San Francisco will always be a distinctive and attractive place, with or without density. And by building more housing and improvin

> Tragedy for the tourists San Francisco will always be a distinctive and attractive place, with or without density. And by building more housing and improving transit, it will become less distinctive in negative ways (homelessness for one). NYC has multiple tourist attractions that have almost 3 times as visitors as those in San Francisco.[1] > tragedy for the wildlife It is a tragedy for the wildlife worldwide for people who work in cities to have to spend countless hours commuting and expending carbon emissions. True, rich land-owners may have to pay more tax and some may see slightly lower appreciation rates, but many other rich people and almost all poor and middle class will benefit. No doubt someone of it is "self-inflicted" at the state-level (Prop 13 for one, and "environmental" approvals used to drag down new development), but there are actionable ways to fix some of this -- passing sales tax, easing rigid zoning laws, and using new funds for transit measures like Measure M in Los Angeles, and Measure B in San Jose. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourist_attractions_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourist_attractions_in_the_Uni...