3 ms·
I like this idea, it seems useful for all the ways described. My skepticism comes from the reviewers themselves. I think they will have a hard time attracting
by redm 9y ago
I like this idea, it seems useful for all the ways described. My skepticism comes from the reviewers themselves. I think they will have a hard time attracting and keeping top talent who can provide high-quality reviews as such talent will want to be creating code, not only reviewing it. I'm not sure how they would resolve this.
- lyal 9y agoReview offers flexiblity that other forms of contracting don't - there's no project management, client negotiation, etc.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- tedmiston 9y agoThe impression I had is that reviewers are part-time contractors vs full-time employees. Probably developers creating code all day long.