4 ms·
Generally I agree. But that doesn't mean the US gov should be friendly with a military dictator, ala Trump's invitation for Thailand's military dictator Prayuth
by geomark 9y ago
Generally I agree. But that doesn't mean the US gov should be friendly with a military dictator, ala Trump's invitation for Thailand's military dictator Prayuth to visit[1]. Although arms sales to Thailand were initially put on hold after the coup it seems they are back on[2]. And Thailand's human rights abuses are not limited to free speech imprisonment. Human trafficking and slavery in the fishing and shrimp farming industry continues unabated while western markets continue purchasing the slave-produced products[3]. There are more than enough reasons to apply sanctions to the regime but, as I said, it's just too cooperative with US spooks to risk losing.
[1]https://www.voanews.com/a/thai-prime-minister-accepts-trump-invitation-visit-us/3832619.html https://www.voanews.com/a/thai-prime-minister-accepts-trump-...
[2]http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-thailand-idUSKBN19K193 http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-thailand-idUSKBN19K193
[3]https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/mar/30/thailand-failing-to-stamp-out-murder-slavery-fishing-industry-starvation-forced-labour-trafficking https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2017/mar/30/t...
- bbarn 9y agoI'd be interested to know what end products these fish go to from point 3.
- geomark 9y agoInvestigative journalists publish reports every year or so. You can probably find more recent ones, but here's one from three years ago[1]. Many of the big supermarket chains are the end points for the slave-produced seafood products, Walmart, Carrefour, Costco, Tesco and some others. I think last year a couple of them threatened to stop buying from Thai suppliers, not sure if they made good on it. [1]https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/jun/10/supermarket-prawns-thailand-produced-slave-labour https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/jun/10/s...