4 ms·
Am I completely misunderstanding something here or should (* 3 3 3) be actually 27 instead of 9? Anyway, nice article, well illustrated, love to read stuff lik
by linopolus 9y ago
Am I completely misunderstanding something here or should (* 3 3 3) be actually 27 instead of 9?
Anyway, nice article, well illustrated, love to read stuff like this!
- FrancisStokes 9y agoOh my god what a glaring mistake! Thank's for pointing it out, I've corrected the article.