Me too. Not sure why using an immutable mountpoint is better than a possibly broken symlink, both result in a write failure. I like the symlink, because it's vi

Me too. Not sure why using an immutable mountpoint is better than a possibly broken symlink, both result in a write failure. I like the symlink, because it's visually obvious when it's broken in the shell, and I can keep my real mounts under /mnt or /pool etc while also putting the target (symlink) in /home/user.