> how bout we just silence rhettoric directed at broad groups By that definition, we should silence any discussion of Democrats, or Republicans, or blacks, or

> how bout we just silence rhettoric directed at broad groups By that definition, we should silence any discussion of Democrats, or Republicans, or blacks, or latinos, or whatever "broad group" you'd like to suppress discussion of at the moment. An actual good argument is that we should suppress views that may lead to terrorism. I'm pretty sure it would be easy to argue that Nazi viewpoints can be pretty terroristic. But then where do we draw the line? How do we as a society decide what is allowed and what isn't without opening up the system to exploitation by an authoritarian regime?