4 ms·
Specifically looking at the Smithsonian article, they don't even mention xenophobia until the last sentence. What they're talking about is instinctive preferen
by DonaldPShimoda 9y ago
Specifically looking at the Smithsonian article, they don't even mention xenophobia until the last sentence.
What they're talking about is instinctive preference for other creatures which the baby identifies with, and in the research the article cites there isn't any direct correlation to race. They talk about food preference — something superficial. There was no research cited to indicate whether the behavior extends to racial distinction, so your using this research to back up your claim that "babies of about the same age as the ones shown in Obama's tweet already display instinctive xenophobia" is intellectually dishonest at best.
And I ignored the Independent article because they're known to be poor at in-depth reporting.
- coriolanus 9y agoMy fault -- you can find much better links if you search for 15 seconds instead of 5: https://www.utoronto.ca/news/racial-bias-may-begin-babies-six-months-u-t-research-reveals https://www.utoronto.ca/news/racial-bias-may-begin-babies-si...
- djtriptych 9y agoAlt-righters will occasionally shitpost stuff like this to derail any real discussion. I've seen dumps of dozens of misleading links to support points like the above. Forcing the thread to disprove each one is an effective method of hijacking the thread.