3 ms·
That can't obviously be true except for some certainly specific workloads. Core 2 was the breakthrough that left AMD in the dust from which it still hasn't rec
by YSFEJ4SWJUVU6 9y ago
That can't obviously be true except for some certainly specific workloads.
Core 2 was the breakthrough that left AMD in the dust from which it still hasn't recovered to parity. Even if I can't recall the numbers, I fail to remember how the very energy-intensive (high clocked) Pentium 4 could have been faster per clock.
Are you sure you're not thinking of the Pentium 3 to 4 change? After all, Core architecture had more in common with P3, didn't it?