4 ms·
Laws don't define right and wrong. If we didn't have laws against murder, would murder not still be wrong? Just because the government is prevented from creat
by didgeoridoo 9y ago
Laws don't define right and wrong.
If we didn't have laws against murder, would murder not still be wrong?
Just because the government is prevented from creating laws that infringe on free speech, that doesn't mean that individual infringement on free speech is morally permissible.
- dragonwriter 9y agoThe problem is you are casting individual exercise of free speech by delining to amplify speech they don't approve of as “infringement on free speech”. Free speech certainly includes the right to try to convince people to amplify your speech. It generally does not include an entitlement to have them do it for you without you having to convince them.