2 ms·
You are either for free speech and net neutrality or against it, you can't have it both ways and choose who can speak freely and who cannot...
by SirLJ 9y ago
You are either for free speech and net neutrality or against it, you can't have it both ways and choose who can speak freely and who cannot...
- intortus 9y agoHate speech excludes other people's freedom of speech (and physical welfare).
- SirLJ 9y agoSo your solution is to hate them and exclude their freedom of speech (and physical welfare) - as you've put it above?
- ue_ 9y ago>you can't have it both ways and choose who can speak freely and who cannot... Why not, exactly? I hear that people say "it's a slippery slope", or "who decides?" as if this puts an end to the argument. It doesn't. If one can formulate a set of rules and further judge on a case-by-case basis, there is little ambiguity left. I am against giving people who advocate or defend genocide or killing people for their ideas/race/etc. a platform to speak on. There's nothing ambiguous about this. You won't find me "defending to the death" the right for people to advocate killing of my friends.