3 ms·
Yes, but saying it doesn't have a concurrency model cause it's missing a feature that's arguably irrelevant to the concurrency model that's recommended by the l
by Vendan 9y ago
Yes, but saying it doesn't have a concurrency model cause it's missing a feature that's arguably irrelevant to the concurrency model that's recommended by the language is pointless, and seemingly serves no other reason then to attack the language.
- dbaupp 9y agoHaving some "feature" that means the concurrency model is sound (aka without undefined behaviour) isn't irrelevant to concurrency models. (I quoted feature because there's a variety of different ways to get this guarantee, some of which don't feel like language features, per se.) On the other hand, it's fair that the convention/tooling is usually good enough; this is a stronger argument and probably a better one to be making than a dubious one about being irrelevant.