3 ms·
To clarify, this is the report I am referring to, and it does not appear to mention CrowdStrike at all: https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf htt
by willstrafach 9y ago
To clarify, this is the report I am referring to, and it does not appear to mention CrowdStrike at all:
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/ICA_2017_01.pdf
- monocasa 9y agoSure, they didn't cite CrowdStrike, but there's no extra information in that report other than what came from CrowdStrike's report.
- willstrafach 9y agoThere definitely appears to be additional information in the IC assessment though.
- monocasa 9y agoLike what?
- willstrafach 9y agoThey're different reports. I don't quite understand what you are saying. > The IC assessment was just regurgitating CS's report. The IC just took CS at their word since they would have contracted out to someone like CS to begin with. The IC assessment appears to be very different. It describes information sourcing without any reference to an analysis of DNC servers (let alone CrowdStrike). There does not appear to be any indication that information from CrowdStrike's analysis or any information from DNC servers at all was used to generate the IC assessment.