> You presupposed that the bias is why the disparity exists in the first place What in my comment tells you that? I made a conscious effort not to bring that u

> You presupposed that the bias is why the disparity exists in the first place What in my comment tells you that? I made a conscious effort not to bring that up. > Its plausible that we completely fix all biases in the industry and the gender ratio does not change whatsoever, or even gets worse. This argument sounds like the global warming denier argument "What if it's not true? What if we make the world a better place to live for nothing?" It is plausible, but right now we have no way to measure it. We do, on the other hand, know that unconscious bias is affecting prospective female candidates. Why don't we focus on fixing the existing problem first?