So at the top of the article, just before the interview starts, there's this: > There’s been a lot of anger on both sides, but I haven’t seen many constructive

So at the top of the article, just before the interview starts, there's this: > There’s been a lot of anger on both sides, but I haven’t seen many constructive discussions between people who disagree on these issues. I and all the women who have contributed in this post feel that there’s forward progress to be made by finding common ground and discussing different viewpoints without yelling. I hope this will be a good forum for that. Do you feel like this article does this? To me, it looks like three people (two of whom openly identify as having left-wing political views) mostly agreeing. That's still useful, but falls way short of "constructive discussion between people who disagree on these issues."